Search the docs⌘K
Glossario
Base
ENIT

Costs toggle

UPDATED 2026-07-30

The costs toggle is the simulation assumption that decides whether a backtest's results include trading costs and financing, or are shown gross of them. In the app it is the switch labelled Costs & interests, described as "Trading costs, financing & interest" and shortened to "Costs" in the assumptions summary. It changes what the same run is showing, not the strategy itself.

Also seen as: Costs & interests, Costs

What does turning costs on change?

Turning Costs & interests on deducts every modelled cost of trading and financing from the run you are looking at. Three components get wired in:

  • Transaction cost — a flat fee charged once per trade execution.
  • Slippage — a proportional cost on each fill, for the gap between the quoted and the filled price.
  • Interest-rate markups — the financing cost of borrowing for leverage or for shorting, charged as a spread over a reference rate.

With the toggle off, all three are zero: the results assume trading and financing were free.

Defaults in Fincanva

  • Costs & interests is off by default, so the figures you meet first are gross of costs and financing.
  • Flipping it switches the displayed result immediately, with no new run — every combination is pre-computed when the strategy runs (see simulation assumptions).
  • It moves every number derived from the equity curve, not only the cost lines: total return, annualized return, the monthly figures and the risk metrics all change.
  • What it deducts shows up as its own bands in the P&L breakdown — "Costs" and "Interest paid".
  • The two interest-rate markups are saved settings you can edit, separate from the toggle that switches them in or out; the per-trade fee and the slippage fraction are fixed platform assumptions with no setting in the app.
  • The Holdings view does not follow this toggle: it always reports with costs off, one of its Holdings forced assumptions.

Worked example

One run, viewed twice. With Costs & interests off the run shows a total return of +42.0%. Flip it on and the same run shows +38.6%: the 3.4pp difference is the trading fees, slippage and financing the strategy would have paid over the period. Nothing about the strategy changed and no new backtest ran — you switched from the gross view to the after-cost view of the identical run. How wide the gap is depends on how much the strategy trades: one that rebalances monthly pays the per-trade fee far more often than one that holds for years.

The figures on this page describe what Fincanva models, not what you should do with your money — see Is this financial advice?.

Where this term is used

Generated · 3 pages

The pages that reference this term — so a term page is somewhere you pass through, not somewhere you land and stop.

Fincanva provides no financial advice. Backtests show what would have happened — not what will.

GLOSSARY · 193 TERMS