Search the docs⌘K
Glossario
Intermediate
ENIT

Holdings forced assumptions

UPDATED 2026-07-30

Holdings forced assumptions are the fixed set of simulation assumptions the Holdings view always applies — profits reinvested, Costs & interests off, Taxes off — no matter which assumptions you have selected on the Analysis views. This is why the same strategy, on the same date, can legitimately show different numbers in Holdings and in Analysis: Holdings always reports a gross, fully-reinvested picture, while Analysis reports whichever combination of Costs & interests, Taxes, and Reinvest profits you have toggled.

Why can Holdings and Analysis disagree on the same strategy?

Because they are reading two different versions of the same run. A backtest is computed as every combination of the three assumptions, and each view picks one: the Analysis views follow your toggles, while Holdings is hard-wired to the gross, reinvesting combination. Once you turn Costs & interests or Taxes on in Analysis, that view's path through history is no longer the path Holdings is showing — costs and tax withdraw money as the simulation runs, which changes the capital available at each rebalance, and therefore the weights, position counts, and cash left over. Both views are correct; they are answering the question under different assumptions.

Which assumptions does Holdings force?

AssumptionAnalysis viewsHoldings view
Reinvest profitsyour choicealways on
Costs & interestsyour choicealways off
Taxesyour choicealways off

In prose: Holdings gives you exactly one reading — reinvesting, gross of costs and gross of tax — and does not let you change it. That is also why the Holdings view carries no assumptions toggle group at all, while the Analysis views do: the controls would have no effect there.

Defaults in Fincanva

  • The forced set matches the default state of the Analysis assumptions (Reinvest profits on, Costs & interests off, Taxes off), so out of the box the two views agree. They diverge only after you switch Costs & interests or Taxes on in Analysis.
  • Holdings is re-parameterized by two things instead: the rebalance date you select and the "Capital" input. Neither of those is an assumption — they change which snapshot you see and how it is scaled.
  • Every Holdings figure inherits the forced set: the "Target notional", "Cash", "Positions" and "Accuracy" KPIs, the "Target allocation" chart, the "Order plan" card, and the "Target positions & exits" sheet.
  • The forced set applies to the Holdings view only. It does not alter the saved run, your saved assumption rates, or anything the Analysis views show.

Worked example

A strategy shows a set of target weights in Holdings for the rebalance date of 1 June, and the same date appears in the Analysis allocation history. With Analysis on its default assumptions the two match. You then switch Taxes on in Analysis: its figures change immediately to the after-tax version — because the tax on the gains realized since the start has been taken out of the simulated account along the way — as events occur under the Administered tax regime, once a year under Declarative — the portfolio reaching 1 June is smaller, so the money behind each weight differs and small positions can round differently. Holdings does not move at all, because it never left the gross, reinvesting version. Nothing is broken and nothing needs re-running: you are looking at the same strategy under two different assumption sets, and only Analysis lets you pick which.

Where this term is used

Generated · 0 pages

The pages that reference this term — so a term page is somewhere you pass through, not somewhere you land and stop.

Also referenced by 3 terms

Fincanva provides no financial advice. Backtests show what would have happened — not what will.

GLOSSARY · 193 TERMS